Features

Both Sides of the Pipeline

• Bookmarks: 6


Why read about the Dakota Pipeline?

There are two sides to every story. It is im­por­tant to un­der­stand both sides of any is­sue in or­der to make an in­formed de­ci­sion. The Dakota Ac­cess Pipeline is a con­tro­ver­sial topic in Amer­i­can so­ci­ety right now. Yet not every Maryville stu­dent or any per­son in gen­eral truly un­der­stands what the con­tro­versy is about. It is im­por­tant to un­der­stand both sides of the con­tro­versy in or­der to make an in­formed de­ci­sion.

 

What is the Dakota Pipeline?

The Dakota Pipeline, or Bakken Pipeline, is to be built by En­ergy Trans­fer Part­ners, a com­pany based in Texas. The pipeline would be used to trans­port Bakken crude oil from North Dakota trav­el­ing through South Dakota and Iowa and even­tu­ally reach­ing an oil tank near Pa­toka, Illi­nois. It is a $3.78 bil­lion pro­ject that would in­volve four states and over 1,172 miles.

 

Photo cour­tesy of dew­ereld­mor­gen.be.

 

Who is op­posed to the Dakota Pipeline?

The Stand­ing Rock Sioux tribe has op­posed the Pipeline from the be­gin­ning. The Stand­ing Rock Sioux is a tribe of about 10,000 Na­tive Amer­i­cans. Re­cently many Amer­i­cans have come to sup­port the tribe in op­po­si­tion of the pipeline.

 

Why are peo­ple op­posed to the Pipeline?

The tribe has been in op­po­si­tion to the pipeline be­cause it is to be built un­der Lake Oahe and the Mis­souri River. These bod­ies of wa­ter are es­sen­tial for the tribe of around 10,000 peo­ple be­cause it is the main source of drink­ing wa­ter for the en­tire tribe. The prob­lem arises be­cause cre­at­ing a pipeline is not a fool-proof process. The Pipeline and Haz­ardous Ma­te­ri­als Safety Ad­min­is­tra­tion (PHMSA) has re­ported more than 3,300 in­ci­dents of leaks and rup­tures at oil and gas pipelines since 2010. Even a small leak could dam­age the tribe’s wa­ter sup­ply. It is im­por­tant to note that the orig­i­nal route for the pipeline was moved by a judge be­cause it en­dan­gered a wa­ter sup­ply in North Dakota. Ad­di­tion­ally, the tribe claims that the pipeline runs through sa­cred bur­ial grounds.

 

Why are peo­ple still in fa­vor of the Pipeline?
The first ar­gu­ment that those in fa­vor of the pro­ject are the fact that the pipeline can help the coun­try eco­nom­i­cally. The pro­ject is ex­pected to cre­ate be­tween 8,000 and 12,000 new jobs. It is es­ti­mated that the con­struc­tion of the pipeline will add nearly $129 mil­lion in tax rev­enue. An­other ar­gu­ment in fa­vor of the pro­ject is the fact that mov­ing crude oil through the pipeline is con­sid­ered safer than the tra­di­tional way of mov­ing it by rail. Fi­nally, the pipeline would al­low for Amer­ica to be­come more en­ergy in­de­pen­dent, lim­it­ing the amount of oil we take from Rus­sia and the Mid­dle East.

 

What does the gov­ern­ment think?

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, in­clud­ing the De­part­ment of Jus­tice and the De­part­ment of In­te­rior, tem­porar­ily blocked the con­struc­tion pro­ject un­til a re­view oc­curred. How­ever, the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion has been in fa­vor of com­ple­tion of the pro­ject.

 

What do Maryville stu­dents think?

Andy Zo­tos, ju­nior, said, “I think the Dakota Pipeline is a ne­ces­sity. I un­der­stand there is risk for the Stand­ing Rock Sioux tribe but there is al­ways risk with any pro­ject. In this case, the pos­i­tives out­weigh the po­ten­tial neg­a­tives. I think the cre­ation of jobs and stim­u­la­tion of the econ­omy will have a pos­i­tive im­pact on thou­sands of Amer­i­cans.”

Joey Lodes, ju­nior, said, “In my opin­ion, I don’t think the United States should go through with the com­ple­tion of the Dakota Pipeline. Na­tive Amer­i­can’s land is sa­cred and if there is any chance that the pipeline may ef­fect their drink­ing wa­ter, we can not go through with it.”

 

Photo cour­tesy of blue­mass­group.com.

6 recommended
1282 views