Academics

Adap­ta­tional Analy­sis: Episode 3 – An In­vis­i­ble Per­spec­tive

• Bookmarks: 1


Of the orig­i­nal mon­sters adapted to the screen by Uni­ver­sal Pic­tures, The In­vis­i­ble Man has proven one of the most en­dur­ing. H.G. Wells’ orig­i­nal sci­ence fic­tion novel in 1897 de­picted a sci­en­tist named Grif­fin who went mad af­ter turn­ing him­self per­ma­nently in­vis­i­ble.

Leigh Whan­nel­l’s 2020 thriller of the same name this time de­picts an In­vis­i­ble Man who is vi­o­lent and ob­ses­sive from the be­gin­ning, adding to the vil­lain’s ter­ror while re­tain­ing the sense of mys­tery. The per­spec­tive shifts to his vic­tims rather than him­self, far less tragic but also more haunt­ing. The In­vis­i­ble Man of 1897 is a clas­sic novel worth re­mem­ber­ing.

Its 2020 adap­ta­tion por­trays a fright­en­ing ex­am­ple of an abu­sive, stalk­ing re­la­tion­ship be­ing taken to its most ex­treme con­clu­sion. Its ex­ag­ger­ated premise un­der­lines a re­al­is­ti­cally haunt­ing de­pic­tion of a nar­cis­sist gaslight­ing and iso­lat­ing some­one he wants to con­trol at any cost.

Both ver­sions of The In­vis­i­ble Man frame the per­spec­tive from oth­ers re­act­ing to the tit­u­lar sci­en­tist, but the book gives more time with Grif­fin to learn his ori­gins and mo­ti­va­tion. His ac­com­plices and en­e­mies get to know him first­hand, as Thomas Mar­vel ini­tially works for him out of fear, while Dr. Kemp re­ceives his ori­gin through con­ver­sa­tion. The film, how­ever, keeps Grif­fin in the shad­ows for most of the run­time, es­tab­lish­ing him as a haunt­ing pres­ence who we know only through his ac­tions. 

As Ce­cilia, his for­mer girl­friend and the pro­tag­o­nist of the movie, ex­plains, “He said that wher­ever I went, he would find me, walk right up to me, and I would­n’t be able to see him,” giv­ing cause to her para­noia (Ce­cilia Kass, The In­vis­i­ble Man, 2020). Ce­cil­i­a’s emo­tional vul­ner­a­bil­ity high­lights the very real dan­ger she faces fight­ing an en­emy she can­not see. The au­di­ence never knows where ex­actly Grif­fin is or what he is plan­ning un­til Ce­cilia her­self learns of it, in­creas­ing the view­er’s anx­i­ety while wait­ing to see what the In­vis­i­ble Man does next.

While both ver­sions of the story em­pha­size the pro­tag­o­nist’s de­scent into mad­ness, the book’s cen­tral fo­cal point is the per­pe­tra­tor of the sto­ry’s crimes, while the film pre­sents a vic­tim who slowly be­comes more ca­pa­ble with each at­tack on her life and men­tal sta­bil­ity. Al­though both Grif­fin and Ce­cilia be­come para­noid and mur­der­ous as so­ci­ety turns against them, one goes mad out of des­per­a­tion, as well as how his power am­pli­fied his nat­ural hu­man ego, “To [be­come in­vis­i­ble] would be to tran­scend magic. And I be­held, un­clouded by doubt, a mag­nif­i­cent vi­sion of all that in­vis­i­bil­ity might mean to a man—the mys­tery, the power, the free­dom. Draw­backs I saw none.” (Wells, The In­vis­i­ble Man, 1897).

Ce­cilia, mean­while, turns to vi­o­lence be­cause of the con­spir­acy against her, but rather than the in­sti­ga­tor of para­noia and mys­tery, she is their vic­tim, fac­ing doubt from friends and au­thor­i­ties be­fore be­ing forced to turn the ta­bles on Grif­fin just to sur­vive. The novel pre­sents a man who suc­cumbed to his own hubris, while the film de­picts a woman who used her tor­men­tor’s meth­ods to re­claim her free­dom.

Fi­nally, the film takes the es­tab­lished nar­cis­sism of Grif­fin from the book and paints it in a re­al­is­tic brush, that of a ma­nip­u­la­tive, abu­sive stalker. Ce­cilia ad­mits at the be­gin­ning of the movie that “He was in com­plete con­trol of every­thing, you know? He con­trolled how I looked, and what I wore, and what I eat… And even­tu­ally, what I thought” (Ce­cilia Kass, The In­vis­i­ble Man). The book’s In­vis­i­ble Man was more akin to a su­pervil­lain, a mad sci­en­tist en­ter­tain­ing delu­sions of grandeur out of spite, pride, and des­per­a­tion. 

The movie’s In­vis­i­ble Man op­er­ates on a smaller scale, but the per­sonal dam­age he deals to Ce­cilia, and the way it mir­rors toxic, abu­sive re­la­tion­ships in real life, gives his hor­ror an un­par­al­leled level of in­ti­macy. 2020’s The In­vis­i­ble Man adapts the story from a pulp sci­ence-fic­tion mys­tery to a psy­cho­log­i­cal thriller, keep­ing the key plot of one man’s hubris lead­ing to mad­ness and vi­o­lence, but shift­ing the per­spec­tive onto his vic­tims and show­ing the ef­fect it has on their psy­che.

Sources

Wells, H. G. (2021, Oc­to­ber 16). The In­vis­i­ble Man. The Pro­ject Guten­berg eBook of The In­vis­i­ble Man, by H. G. Wells. https://​www.guten­berg.org/​files/​5230/​5230-h/​5230-h.htm

Whan­nell, Leigh (Di­rec­tor). (2020). The In­vis­i­ble Man [Film]. Uni­ver­sal Pic­tures.

667 views